anotheroxymoron @ 2006-06-28T18:24:00
People tend to think of memory as being like a tape recorder or a camera, capturing what's out there. That doesn't match with the current thinking of most memory researchers. Their research implies that your memory of an event is something you construct from bits and pieces: from what you saw and heard and experienced and felt at the time; from things people told you afterward; from suggestions and thoughts and implications, all filtered by your attitude, by who you are
Happening-truth is the bare facts--what happened at such and such a time. Story-truth is the story you tell yourself about that truth, the details that you fill in, the Technicolor version that helps you make sense of the world. In story-truth, you may unconsciously fill in a little bit here, adjust things a little bit there--in the same way that a fiction writer consciously edits and recasts a narrative.
Elizabeth Loftus writes about some of the reasons that people are disturbed by her research: "Human beings feel attached to their remembered past, for the people, places, and events that we enshrine in memory give structure and definition to the person we think of as our 'self.' " If we accept that memory spills over into dreams and imagination, then how do we know what's real and what's not?
It is easy to think of yourself as the sum of your memories--the end product of all that you've ever experienced. But after doing research into memory, we find that it makes sense to reverse that statement. Your memories are the end product of all you've ever thought and done, filtered through your perceptions and opinions. Who you are is shaped by your memories, and your memories are shaped by who you are. The perceived time
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Install Seat On Kohler Rialto
anotheroxymoron @ 2006-06-28T18:04:00
the time we feel like a river of events, without which would not be necessary to question the nature of time itself may be. Our perception is limited to well on the present, and yet one can imagine the existence of the present difficult. For how long does it last? No sooner is there, it is also already become the past. It is never really here, or does it? In research, we examined this phenomenon further. The studies suggest that indiscriminate actions are initiated preconscious (About 250 ms before the realization) and enter only during the run into consciousness. This can be understand in a variety of actions. Furthermore, actions are triggered by artificial stimulation of brain regions that later as an action intended to be perceived. It is also here a counter set of feelings and neuro-biological findings.
Perhaps we should be more closely involved with perception and cognition, when we're at it, make us think about the essence "of lived time." The control of conscious perception is learned and is subject to regulation by parameters such as attention, practice and expectation. During the processing of stimuli and perceptions are constantly assessed and filtered. Only the most important observations come from the sensory memory to the short-term memory (KZG), which has a capacity of only 5-7 information. However, it may have because of the integration processes of abstraction and a high information density. Repeat this process and are elaborated in the KZG information in long-term memory (LTM) is stored. In LZG stored information can sometimes be maintained for life. You are in contrast to the information in the KZG not engrams (feedback nerve impulses), but probably saved biochemically. The Lf can be in a procedural memory and divide a declarative memory. The procedural memory stores information on movements, behavior, and includes the cognitive skills. The declarative memory stores facts and event knowledge and allows fast, associative access to its content. However, in this willingly, you can only very limited access.
The moment
Scientists have found that we perceive the moment with a short delay. The brain must first decide what information is out of the huge flood of impressions that give us our sense really up to our Consciousness forward. If we compare this flood of impressions of a Niagara Falls, our consciousness achieved just as much as a dripping faucet is on its own. From this it is still incredibly high number of pieces of information our brain decides finally, which of them in the ultra short-term memory, which in the short term, and which are "stored" in long-term memory have, and these different modes of operation.
perception remains to be mentioned in general or that we perceive the world only as it must be in our opinion. Even memory is subject to this order. Memory is a compromise between rule and experienced. If several people the course of a car accident report says, each witness's story as he believes that things have happened. You assign the reality of their theory under. In this respect, perception is a hypothesis about reality, and no more. Perception is considered subjective. Each person takes his surroundings different way, so to speak, everyone lives in "his world", has different views and ideas of what is right, wrong, true and untrue. While one considers time travel possible, others are in turn believed the opposite, because this idea can not agree with their worldview.
If our reality that is only delayed Perceive will take place when the moment - that is what we actually call a "presence"? Is it the presence at all? No sooner is there, it seems to have already become the past. Can one really speak of "present" when no one knows how long it lasts, and when it actually occurs? Let the present simply as a point on our time line, moving toward the future, and exactly located between the past and future, leads to another problem: What is history? Since neither the past nor the future, at any time experienced is existent, we could see the past as a collection of information in our heads, which follows from the already experienced present. A paradox, since we are still looking for an explanation of the term "present". The future situation is more complicated. It is merely a logical conclusion from this that require past and present, a future. She is also associated with experience. We can assume that we have to die sometime, as it was for all people has always been. The probability is very high that it will also undergo us like that. There must be much like a future.
How long is the shortest moment, has to do from the viewer itself. Since no single time exists, the question of the duration of the moment may be unnecessary. If one assumes that light travels at top speed, one might argue that a moment lasts as long as a particle of light in the same place lingers. This duration is impossible to determine. The uncertainty principle would not allow that definition. And "stay" of the light may well be the question.
Finally, we should try to enjoy the beautiful moments of life and all the other as quickly as possible to forget ...
the time we feel like a river of events, without which would not be necessary to question the nature of time itself may be. Our perception is limited to well on the present, and yet one can imagine the existence of the present difficult. For how long does it last? No sooner is there, it is also already become the past. It is never really here, or does it? In research, we examined this phenomenon further. The studies suggest that indiscriminate actions are initiated preconscious (About 250 ms before the realization) and enter only during the run into consciousness. This can be understand in a variety of actions. Furthermore, actions are triggered by artificial stimulation of brain regions that later as an action intended to be perceived. It is also here a counter set of feelings and neuro-biological findings.
Perhaps we should be more closely involved with perception and cognition, when we're at it, make us think about the essence "of lived time." The control of conscious perception is learned and is subject to regulation by parameters such as attention, practice and expectation. During the processing of stimuli and perceptions are constantly assessed and filtered. Only the most important observations come from the sensory memory to the short-term memory (KZG), which has a capacity of only 5-7 information. However, it may have because of the integration processes of abstraction and a high information density. Repeat this process and are elaborated in the KZG information in long-term memory (LTM) is stored. In LZG stored information can sometimes be maintained for life. You are in contrast to the information in the KZG not engrams (feedback nerve impulses), but probably saved biochemically. The Lf can be in a procedural memory and divide a declarative memory. The procedural memory stores information on movements, behavior, and includes the cognitive skills. The declarative memory stores facts and event knowledge and allows fast, associative access to its content. However, in this willingly, you can only very limited access.
The moment
Scientists have found that we perceive the moment with a short delay. The brain must first decide what information is out of the huge flood of impressions that give us our sense really up to our Consciousness forward. If we compare this flood of impressions of a Niagara Falls, our consciousness achieved just as much as a dripping faucet is on its own. From this it is still incredibly high number of pieces of information our brain decides finally, which of them in the ultra short-term memory, which in the short term, and which are "stored" in long-term memory have, and these different modes of operation.
perception remains to be mentioned in general or that we perceive the world only as it must be in our opinion. Even memory is subject to this order. Memory is a compromise between rule and experienced. If several people the course of a car accident report says, each witness's story as he believes that things have happened. You assign the reality of their theory under. In this respect, perception is a hypothesis about reality, and no more. Perception is considered subjective. Each person takes his surroundings different way, so to speak, everyone lives in "his world", has different views and ideas of what is right, wrong, true and untrue. While one considers time travel possible, others are in turn believed the opposite, because this idea can not agree with their worldview.
If our reality that is only delayed Perceive will take place when the moment - that is what we actually call a "presence"? Is it the presence at all? No sooner is there, it seems to have already become the past. Can one really speak of "present" when no one knows how long it lasts, and when it actually occurs? Let the present simply as a point on our time line, moving toward the future, and exactly located between the past and future, leads to another problem: What is history? Since neither the past nor the future, at any time experienced is existent, we could see the past as a collection of information in our heads, which follows from the already experienced present. A paradox, since we are still looking for an explanation of the term "present". The future situation is more complicated. It is merely a logical conclusion from this that require past and present, a future. She is also associated with experience. We can assume that we have to die sometime, as it was for all people has always been. The probability is very high that it will also undergo us like that. There must be much like a future.
How long is the shortest moment, has to do from the viewer itself. Since no single time exists, the question of the duration of the moment may be unnecessary. If one assumes that light travels at top speed, one might argue that a moment lasts as long as a particle of light in the same place lingers. This duration is impossible to determine. The uncertainty principle would not allow that definition. And "stay" of the light may well be the question.
Finally, we should try to enjoy the beautiful moments of life and all the other as quickly as possible to forget ...
Sandals Flowers Motive
research
It was Dunne's work, the second largest of the 20-time researchers Century, inspired the writer J. B. Priestley (right). For him, time is a three-part process: time = one time, two-time is the time of the possible future and time is the time three of the creative imagination. His book Man and time ("Man and Time"), written in the forties, contains fascinating insights into the possible nature of time. He claims that the chronological time is only an invention to have an explanation of why one event follows another, that is, the term is dependent on the causality. And, as Jung says, is one of the main acausality principles of the universe, there is no reason why the time is not us around by the nose should.
JW Dunne, whose pioneering work in An Experiment with Time ("An experiment with time")
www.wasistzeit.de
The science says about "Time":
"There are at least three arrows of time that distinguish our past from the future:
· the thermodynamic arrow - the arrow of time in which increases the disorder (law of entropy)
· the psychological arrow - the arrow of time in which we are the past and not the future remember
· the cosmological arrow of time - the direction in which the universe expands and contracts
empty space with pairs of virtual particles and antiparticles filled incurred together, separate and meet again in order to eliminate each other. Therefore, the one pair of particles as a single particle see who travels in a closed loop through space-time. The couple moved forward in time, it is particles, it moves backward in time, it is known as anti-particles, which moves forward in time. "
Many people make a totally false picture of the time. It appears, as the time went everywhere and for every being the same speed. This is so not quite right. Rather, each man his "own Clock" has. How fast for them it goes depends on the gravity and the speed with which it moves. The more someone is the speed of light (about 300 000 kilometers per second) is, the slower time passes for him from the perspective of a non-moving observer. Or the other way around, one could also say that changes for the traveler in such a flying object, first anything, but could be a motionless observer from Earth, the events considered in the flying object, it would come to him well before as if you have a film with too slow speed Playing.
Man this fact is also called the "twin paradox" - One of two twins, a flight is taking with approximate Speed of light. When he returns, his twin brother a few years older than him. The interesting thing is that it looks first for both, as would the time go slower at each other. Meet both of the trip again, neither has a "time advantage", which would be attributed to the high speed. Only the acceleration (starting, stopping, turning) have made the twin traveling abroad
age more slowly. The assumption that the situation is symmetrical for both twins, as they're both relatively distant from each other does not, therefore, since the remaining on earth will notice nothing of the movement reversal. We speak in reverse motion, by a "change of inertial frame.
It was Dunne's work, the second largest of the 20-time researchers Century, inspired the writer J. B. Priestley (right). For him, time is a three-part process: time = one time, two-time is the time of the possible future and time is the time three of the creative imagination. His book Man and time ("Man and Time"), written in the forties, contains fascinating insights into the possible nature of time. He claims that the chronological time is only an invention to have an explanation of why one event follows another, that is, the term is dependent on the causality. And, as Jung says, is one of the main acausality principles of the universe, there is no reason why the time is not us around by the nose should.
JW Dunne, whose pioneering work in An Experiment with Time ("An experiment with time")
www.wasistzeit.de
The science says about "Time":
"There are at least three arrows of time that distinguish our past from the future:
· the thermodynamic arrow - the arrow of time in which increases the disorder (law of entropy)
· the psychological arrow - the arrow of time in which we are the past and not the future remember
· the cosmological arrow of time - the direction in which the universe expands and contracts
empty space with pairs of virtual particles and antiparticles filled incurred together, separate and meet again in order to eliminate each other. Therefore, the one pair of particles as a single particle see who travels in a closed loop through space-time. The couple moved forward in time, it is particles, it moves backward in time, it is known as anti-particles, which moves forward in time. "
Many people make a totally false picture of the time. It appears, as the time went everywhere and for every being the same speed. This is so not quite right. Rather, each man his "own Clock" has. How fast for them it goes depends on the gravity and the speed with which it moves. The more someone is the speed of light (about 300 000 kilometers per second) is, the slower time passes for him from the perspective of a non-moving observer. Or the other way around, one could also say that changes for the traveler in such a flying object, first anything, but could be a motionless observer from Earth, the events considered in the flying object, it would come to him well before as if you have a film with too slow speed Playing.
Man this fact is also called the "twin paradox" - One of two twins, a flight is taking with approximate Speed of light. When he returns, his twin brother a few years older than him. The interesting thing is that it looks first for both, as would the time go slower at each other. Meet both of the trip again, neither has a "time advantage", which would be attributed to the high speed. Only the acceleration (starting, stopping, turning) have made the twin traveling abroad
age more slowly. The assumption that the situation is symmetrical for both twins, as they're both relatively distant from each other does not, therefore, since the remaining on earth will notice nothing of the movement reversal. We speak in reverse motion, by a "change of inertial frame.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)